Steven’s Status Report 9.28

This week in a meeting with my professor and TA we explored a technical challenge in our previous design, which was the question of how to power a movable rechargeable robot. We started with two solutions: one was to use wires to power the robots, however the tangling and resistance of the wires could cause a number of complications; the other was to add batteries to each of the robots, however after doing some research we realized that it would be difficult to charge the robots by homing them in place as the electrodes are too small and would place a huge demand on the robot’s controls and would be difficult to control. too large an electrode would pose problems such as circuit safety.

After several iterations this week, we finally decided to use a completely new design. We used the Gantry system, however, in order to achieve the effect of charging multiple devices at the same time, we came up with the innovative idea of using magnets on the end of the Gantry to move the charging pads across a layer of acrylic. This design is stable and efficient and allows for the charging of multiple devices.

After finalizing the design, I completed the mechanical design for the second version. This version focused more on the internal principles and concepts than the previous design, using real dimensions and an aluminum frame. This also meant that our design was being further refined. However, our Gantry system does not have the ability to purchase a frame directly due to its size, so we are still researching and discussing the design of this system. However the overall design is still very clear, and I have set deadlines for the complete overall design and hardware purchases that need to be made before fall break to ensure that our plans can continue to develop as we expect.

Steven’s Status Report 9.21

This week I’ve been focusing mostly on the mechanical design aspect of the project. After discussions with the group, we basically settled on a three-tier table design: the bottom layer is for the camera module, the second layer is a transparent acrylic panel for charging the robot to move around, and the top layer is a transparent tabletop.

I have our V1.0 CAD model finished. And we are also working on the mechanical design for the moving charging robots. We got out inspiration of the moving charging robot from CMU Zoom Lab’s multi-agent robot and we consider to use ESP-32 as the Central Processor for our robot as its compact size and built-in wireless communication features fits our application.

Next week, I will further polish the CAD design for our desk and starting the detail CAD design for the charging robot with real-world dimensions. Hopefully, we can have a better design image while at the same time starting the component selection process, as the model of motor used by the charging robot could impact a lot on the mechanical design.

As for the presentation slides, I was in charged of division of labor, schedule, and Preliminary Testing & Validation. I have reviewed the advice from the post-presentation feedback and audience reflects that our Gantt chart is hard to view. They also suggest that our task division in the Gantt chart could be more achievable and solid if we can split the task according to the different levels of the tasks. So next week, I will also further refines our Gantt chart and then ask for professors’ and TAs’ guidance.