Team Status Report for 9/28

  1. What are the most significant risks that could jeopardize the success of the
    project? How are these risks being managed? What contingency plans are ready?

The most significant risk at this stage is developing an emotion recognition model that is accurate enough to be useful. Top-of-the-line models currently are nearing the 80% accuracy rate which is somewhat low. Coming within reach of this metric will be crucial to ensuring our use cases are met. This has become a larger concern now that we will be making our own, custom model. This risk is being managed by ensuring that we have backup, pre-existing models that can be averaged with our model in case our base accuracy is too low.

Additionally, user testing has become a concern for us as we do not want to trigger the need for review by the IRB. This prevents us from doing user testing targeted at autistic individuals; however, we can still conduct them on the general population.

2. Were any changes made to the existing design of the system (requirements,block diagram, system spec, etc)? Why was this change necessary, what costsdoes the change incur, and how will these costs be mitigated going forward?

The main change was cited above. We will be making our own computer vision and emotional recognition model. This is primarily with the goal to show our prowess within the area of computer vision and not leveraging too many existing components. This constricts Noah’s time somewhat; however, Mason will be picking up the camera and website integration so that Noah can fully focus on the model.

3. Provide an updated schedule if changes have occurred.

No Schedule changes at this time.

4. This is also the place to put some photos of your progress or to brag about athe component you got working.

The physical updates are included in our design proposal.

Additionally, here is the dataset we will use to train the first version of the computer vision model (https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/jonathanoheix/face-expression-recognition-dataset).

Part A (Noah Champagne):

Due to the intended audience of EmotiSense being a particularly marginalized group of people, it is our utmost concern that the product can deliver true and accurate readings of emotions. We know that EmotiSense can greatly increase neurodivergent people’s ability to engage socially, and want to help facilitate that benefit to the best of our abilities. But, we care deeply about maintaining the safety of our users and have duly considered that a false reading of a situation could discourage or bring about harm to them. As such we have endeavored to create a system that only offers emotional readings once a very high confidence level has been reached. This will help to ensure the health of those using the product who can confidently use our system.

Additionally, our product serves to increase the welfare of a marginalized group who suffers to a larger extent than the general population. Providing them with this product helps to close the gap in conversational understanding between those with neurodivergence and those without it. This will help to provide this group with more equity in terms of welfare.

Part B (Kapil Krishna):

EmotiSense is highly sensitive to the needs of neurodivergent communities. We want to emphasize the importance of being sensitive to the way neurodivergent communities interact and support one another. The design of EmotiSense aims to be sensitive to this fact and simply enhances self-awareness and social interactions, not combat neurodivergence itself. Additionally. EmotiSense aims to provide support for those who interact with neurodivergent individuals in providing a tool and strategy to facilitate better communication without compromising autonomy. Lastly, we observe that there has been increasing advocacy for technology to empower those with disabilities. EmotiSense aims to align with this trend in reducing social barriers and creating more inclusivity and awareness. With regard to economic organizations, we notice that affordability and availability of the device are key in creating the most impact possible.

Part C (Mason Stark):

Although our primary aims fit better into the previous two categories, Emotisense can still suit significant use cases for economic endeavors. One such use case is customer satisfaction. Many businesses will try to get customer satisfaction data by polling customers online, or even by physical customer satisfaction polling systems (think of those boxes with frown and smile faces in airport bathrooms). However these systems are oftentimes under utilized, and subject to significant sampling biases. Being able to get the emotions of customers in real time could better assist businesses in uncovering accurate satisfaction data. When businesses have access to accurate customer satisfaction data, they can leverage that data to improve their business functionality and profitability. Some specific businesses where emotisense could be deployed include “order at the counter” restaurants, banks, and customer service desks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *