Team Status Report for 2/7

The most significant risks that could jeopardize the project’s success are related to the lens and mirror not working correctly. For example, the screen might appear to have double images if our 1 mm beam splitter is too thick, or it could appear out of focus if the screen isn’t placed exactly at the lens’s focal point. In addition, the screen could be warped by the beam splitter unless the angle is correct. Finally, the beam splitter is 50% transparent and 50% reflective, but the screen’s display might be too dim or too bright compared to the outside world. We’re managing these risks by allowing extra time and money in our budget for changes that might need to be made to the lens and mirror system.

This week, we also made changes to the existing design in terms of its screen. Instead of using a large screen that spans the width of the goggles at the top, we’re using a simpler approach that shows the screen in a single eye. We made this decision so that we can use a simpler, more common approach and use more widely-used parts such as rectangular displays, lenses from Google Cardboard, and square beam splitters.

There aren’t any updates to the schedule because everything’s on time so far.

David’s Status Report for 2/7

This week, I continued researching the design we plan to build for our project. There are a variety of beam splitters to choose from, so it is important to consider several factors, including cost, visibility, ease of construction, and user comfort. After discussing my findings with my teammates, we decided to use a basic flat beam splitter lens, as it will be the most comfortable for the user and the easiest to integrate into the goggles.

Progress is currently on schedule.

Next week, I will continue assisting Aidan with the CAD model and begin testing the prototype for comfort and stability.