Team Status Report for 02/08/2025

Our team created our proposal slide deck and presented it. This helped us flesh out more details of our project and how all of our parts will interact as a system. We considered how user-friendly we wanted the process to be, the maximum amount of time it should take to scan and generate a 3D model, and the scope of what objects would be scannable. We realized some limitations that real world conditions would present to us. We will have to test how much noise will occur from outside lighting and other real conditions with the flatbed. We will also consider different options for our mechanical arm based on how either rotating with a felt tip on a glass surface or electro-adhesion would work with different materials and geometries. Additionally, we need to see if it’d be necessary to place anything under the scanned object, such as film, to prevent scratching or if it would help/hinder rotation of the object.

Next week we plan on looking through the inventory list for components of our manipulator, and placing orders for a flatbed scanner and potentially any manipulator parts that we can’t find in the inventory.

Sophia’s Status Report for 02/08/2025

Most of my work time this week was spent on preparing the proposal presentation. Including fleshing out requirements and quantitative measures for it, diagrams, and creating the slides themselves. I worked with my teammates over calls to flesh it out. My team all agreed that I would be presenting the proposal presentation. I spent time practicing to make sure I explained the project in a clear manner, not just directly reading from the slides, and asking my teammates about their parts of the project so that I had a thorough understanding of all of the elements.

Decided on scanner and library – I did research on what software libraries could potentially work for our project, particularly what libraries were available to command scanners. I found one called Naps2 that should work for any popular brand of scanner. I also decided on a scanner to buy, it’s a 4800 dpi Cannon scanner. 4800 dpi is plenty of detail for the scans, Cannon is a very common brand, and the scanner is small and shouldn’t be too difficult to move or store. It’s also less than $100, which leaves plenty of budget for materials for the hardware of our device.

My progress is currently on schedule. Next week, I will start into using the Naps2 library and creating the software that would interact directly with the scanner sending commands, would receive those scans, and then send them to Yon’s image processing software. Depending how far I get, I could even start unit testing it. Hopefully it will be in a decent state by the time the scanner is ordered and arrives for practical testing.