This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
projects [2015/12/06 19:18] nandita [Poster Session (December 15th)] |
projects [2015/12/13 18:59] nandita [Final Presentation (December 14th)] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
===== Final Presentation (December 14th) ===== | ===== Final Presentation (December 14th) ===== | ||
- | **Format:** 12 mins in total: presenting slides (10 mins) + Q&A (2 mins). | + | **When:** December 14th, 2015 (2:00 - 4:30 PM) |
+ | |||
+ | **Where:** CIC 4th Floor, Panther Hollow Conference Room | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Format:** 15 mins in total: presenting slides (12 mins) + Q&A (3 mins). **Please practice for this length.** You will be given a warning at 10 minutes and cut off at 12. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Submission:** You must send your slides in pptx format to 740-official@ece.cmu.edu by 11 AM on December 14th. We will be running all presentations on a staff computer to reduce delay between presenters. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **What to present:** | ||
+ | * The problem you are solving + your goal | ||
+ | * How is this different from past work? What is your novelty? | ||
+ | * The key idea behind your solution | ||
+ | * More details on your mechanims | ||
+ | * Your methodology to test your ideas | ||
+ | * Results and analyses from your evaluation and comparison with prior work | ||
+ | * Conclusion with advantages and shortcomings of your mechanism and future work | ||
+ | |||
+ | ** Presentation Schedule (14th December)** | ||
+ | * Dimitrios Stamoulis and Antonis Manousis | ||
+ | * Jonathan Leung and Madhav Iyengar | ||
+ | * Vignesh Balaji | ||
+ | * Elliot Rosen and Gaurav Srivastava | ||
+ | * Elena Feldman, Ashish Shrestha and Amanda Marano | ||
+ | * Amirali Boroumand and Minesh Patel | ||
+ | * Abhijith Kashyap | ||
+ | |||
+ | ** Presentation Schedule (15th December)** | ||
+ | * Damla Senol and Jeremie Kim | ||
+ | * Kais Kudrolli and Raghav Gupta | ||
Line 100: | Line 128: | ||
{{:poster.pdf|example poster 1 pdf}}, {{:poster.pptx|example poster 1 ppt}} | {{:poster.pdf|example poster 1 pdf}}, {{:poster.pptx|example poster 1 ppt}} | ||
+ | |||
{{:poster1.pdf|example poster 2 pdf}}, {{:poster1.pptx|example poster 2 ppt}} | {{:poster1.pdf|example poster 2 pdf}}, {{:poster1.pptx|example poster 2 ppt}} | ||
[[http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ece740/f11/doku.php?id=wiki:project#poster_session|more example posters]] | [[http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ece740/f11/doku.php?id=wiki:project#poster_session|more example posters]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Final Project Report (December 20th) ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | You will hand in a report in the conference submission style. | ||
+ | Your final report should be formatted and written as if you are submitting the report to a top computer architecture conference. | ||
+ | The report should include the following: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * A descriptive title and author names | ||
+ | * Abstract | ||
+ | * Introduction (Problem and Motivation) | ||
+ | * Related Work and its Shortcomings | ||
+ | * Description of the Techniques (designed and evaluated) | ||
+ | * Evaluation Methodology | ||
+ | * Results and Analyses | ||
+ | * Conclusion/Summary | ||
+ | * Lessons Learned, Shortcomings, and Future Work | ||
+ | * Acknowledgements (if any) | ||
+ | * References (cited throughout the paper) | ||
+ | |||
+ | The page limit is 10 double column, single-spaced pages. Make sure your document is spell-checked and grammatically sound. You are encouraged to use the LaTeX template above. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Advice: | ||
+ | The key characteristic that distinguishes a “good” research paper from a “bad” one is the existence of “clearly explained insight.” I expect the highest quality of writing as well as clear descriptions of the ideas and techniques from the final report. Even if your research results in a “negative result” (not all research ideas pan out to be useful, in fact few of them do) writing it in a very insightful and intuitive manner can make the research very powerful and important. So, please do spend a significant amount of time and effort to ensure that your report is insightful and explains the ideas very clearly (possibly with examples and good analogies). | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Examples:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | See the readings throughout this course for examples. Some selected favorites: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{:parbs_isca08.pdf|Mutlu and Moscibroda, “Parallelism-Aware Batch Scheduling,” ISCA 2008.}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{mutlu_micro05.pdf|Onur Mutlu, Hyesoon Kim, and Yale N. Patt, "Address-Value Delta (AVD) Prediction: Increasing the Effectiveness of Runahead Execution by Exploiting Regular Memory Allocation Patterns," MICRO 2005.}} | ||
+ | |||