This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
buzzword [2015/02/04 19:24] rachata |
buzzword [2015/02/06 19:21] albert lecture 10 words added |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 364: | Line 364: | ||
* Two bits counter based prediction | * Two bits counter based prediction | ||
* One more bit for hysteresis | * One more bit for hysteresis | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Lecture 10 (2/6 Fri.) ===== | ||
+ | * Branch prediction accuracy | ||
+ | * Why are they very important? | ||
+ | * Differences between 99% accuracy and 98% accuracy | ||
+ | * Cost of a misprediction when the pipeline is veryd eep | ||
+ | * Global branch correlation | ||
+ | * Some branches are correlated | ||
+ | * Local branch correlation | ||
+ | * Some branches can depend on the result of past branches | ||
+ | * Pattern history table | ||
+ | * Record global taken/not taken results. | ||
+ | * Cost vs. accuracy (What to record, do you record PC? Just taken/not taken info.?) | ||
+ | * One-level branch predictor | ||
+ | * What information are used | ||
+ | * Two-level branch prediction | ||
+ | * What entries do you keep in the global history? | ||
+ | * What entries do you keep in the local history? | ||
+ | * How many table? | ||
+ | * Cost when training a table | ||
+ | * What are the purposes of each table? | ||
+ | * Potential problems of a two-level history | ||
+ | * GShare predictor | ||
+ | * Global history predictor is hashed with the PC | ||
+ | * Store both GHP and PC in one combined information | ||
+ | * How do you use the information? Why does the XOR result still usable? | ||
+ | * Warmup cost of the branch predictor | ||
+ | * Hybrid solution? Fast warmup is used first, then switch to the slower one. | ||
+ | * Tournament predictor (Alpha 21264) | ||
+ | * Predicated execution - eliminate branches | ||
+ | * What are the tradeoffs | ||
+ | * What if the block is big (can lead to execution a lot of useless work) | ||
+ | * Allows easier code optimization | ||
+ | * From the compiler PoV, predicated execution combine multiple basic blocks into one bigger basic block | ||
+ | * Reduce control dependences | ||
+ | * Need ISA support | ||
+ | * Wish branches | ||
+ | * Compiler generate both predicated and non-predicated codes | ||
+ | * HW design which one to use | ||
+ | * Use branch prediction on an easy to predict code | ||
+ | * Use predicated execution on a hard to predict code | ||
+ | * Compiler can be more aggressive in optimimzing the code | ||
+ | * What are the tradeoffs (slide# 47) | ||
+ | * Multi-path execution | ||
+ | * Execute both paths | ||
+ | * Can lead to wasted work | ||
+ | * VLIW | ||
+ | * SuperScalar | ||