![\"\"](\"http:\/\/course.ece.cmu.edu\/~ece500\/projects\/s21-teamb5\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/127\/2021\/02\/Screen-Shot-2021-03-13-at-9.56.53-PM-226x300.png\")
<\/p>\nThis week I gave the design review presentation and worked on pose comparison. By getting the coordinates of the key points detected by OpenPose, I am able to compute the angles (R1, L1, R2… L4) between limbs as indicated on the image below.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
We can compare the poses by computing the differences between the standard angles and the user’s angles. I tested it with some images and this comparison method worked well overall for front-view poses. For side-view poses, since some of the limbs are hidden behind the body, I skipped the undetected key points and only compared the valid angles. I will do more tests to see if some specific poses need to be handled separately.<\/p>\n
I have been trying to figure out details about pose alignment.\u00a0I also did some research on dynamic time warping, especially its implementation and use cases.<\/p>\n
I think I am on schedule. Next week I will continue to work on the design report. I will also work on pose alignment, try to use\/implement DTW to\u00a0accommodate workouts at different speeds and test it with videos.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
This week I gave the design review presentation and worked on pose comparison. By getting the coordinates of the key points detected by OpenPose, I am able to compute the angles (R1, L1, R2… L4) between limbs as indicated on the image below. We can compare the poses by computing the differences between the standard … <\/p>\n