Team Status Report for 12/9

This week, all the team members worked together to complete the overall system test with 3 instructors and test the performance of the system a few more times with different speeds to figure out the speed that’s most stable to be used during the final demo. Since we have completed all the design and build of our system, the most significant risk at the current stage would be unexpected damage to the physical components. Therefore, we would be particularly careful during the testing and ensure the motor is not overheated and the current and voltage supplied would not exceed the corresponding value on the data sheets that damage our motor driver or motor.
There has been no change made to the design of our system during the past week.

The unit tests we have carried out include latency tests for both erasing and image capturing, the user test of the website, and the power consumption test. In addition to that, we have completed the overall system test with 3 instructors and 3 students. From the latency test, we found the time taken for erasing a 30’’x 15’’ area of board takes 50s and the captured image should be displayed in 1.3s. From the power consumption test, we found that the peak power of our entire system is 50.65W. From the user test of the website, we have identified several confusing elements and the lack of instructions on the website, so we have modified the nav bar as well as added different instructions for both students and instructors on their home pages. From the overall system test, we have received feedback that the latency of the erasing board is a bit too large. For this reason, we are still exploring the peak speed our system can achieve while ensuring its stability. Other than that, we have also received feedback from Prof. Yu and Prof. Mukherjee that there are some glares in the images, so we will also find an optimized location to place the camera by adjusting its relative height to the board to avoid this issue.

Wendy’s Status Report for 12/9

This week, the main focus of our team is to complete the rest of the testing as well as prepare for the final demo and final report. We have tested the entire system a few more times to ensure the communications between RPi and the web application are stable, and the connection with the camera is stable. Moreover, we improved the code so that the motor is enabled only when the erase function is triggered to reduce the noise produced by the motor. After that, we tested the current system with three instructors, and despite 2 of them reporting there is some non-negligible latency in the erasing process, all of them agreed that the rest of the functionalities seem useful and they would prefer using the system in a classroom setting. In addition to that, I have also fixed some minor issues in the backend of the web application such as making sure the storing paths of images for different classes are different and throttling the erase function to ensure the button is not accidentally clicked too many times within a short period of time.

Since we have completed all the goals we have set for the MVP, we are currently on schedule. For the next week, we plan to demonstrate our system during the final demo on Monday and complete the final video and report after that.

Wendy’s Status Report for 12/2

This week, the focus of our team is to finish building the mechanical part of the system and continue the testing process. Currently, our team has completed wiring the motors and combined all attachments on the board. The motor on the screw rod works well and RPi can interface with the web application. Moreover, after we received the DRV8825 motor driver and tested it out with our NEMA 17 motor, we found that the speed of erasing also improved. After testing the latency of erasing and maximum power consumption together, we also spent some time together completing the slides for the final presentation and recording a video for it.

Individually, I have also conducted the web application usability testing with one professor and one student, and they both gave the feedback that the website is succinct and not hard to use. However, the professor mentioned that it would be great if there could be a instruction to help users get familiarized with every functionality and the nav bar can be more clear, so I will also work on that and add this to our website.

Based on our schedule, I’m mostly on schedule except that we are still recruiting more participants for our final functionality testing. We will try to reach out to more professors and students and get it done before next Wednesday. I will also polish the user interface of our website based on feedback. Moreover, if I have extra time, I will also spend some time investigating how to the web application with Canvas so instructors do not need to manually enter the student ID (which is a post-mvp goal).

Wendy’s Status Report for 11/18

This week, our team started to build the mechanical part of our system. Currently, we finished the basic skeleton of the system to hold the board and upper linear slides. However, due to the fact that the NEMA 23 motor we received doesn’t match its specification, we could not fit the NEMA 23 motor in our system unfortunately. Therefore, we will start with incorporating the NEMA 17 motor we used before this Sunday and wait for any reply from the supplier.

Individually, I spent the majority of my time working on refining the user interface of the web application and adding functionalities to enhance the user experience. I have updated the CSS of our web application incorporated some responsive design and implemented the home and logout functionalities and button as the content of a dropdown box located at the navigation bar. Moreover, for the create/modify class form page, I have changed the integer field of width to a choice field for users to select which preconfigured board the class will use since this is more intuitive for users (and typically the instructors will not use their own board while lecturing), and I changed the clean function of the form to validate whether the student IDs input by instructors are valid and raise a form validation error if one of them is not.


Regarding testing, since I’m responsible for the camera, I have completed the camera latency test by writing javascript to measure the time taken between a user clicking the “erasing board“ button and the picture getting posted to the website  5 times and taking an average. The time averages to 1.3s and meets the metric (3s) we set for the user case requirement.

I also finished the script for the usability testing of our website. Therefore, according to our schedule, my progress is on schedule. 

Next week, our group will finish building the mechanical attachment and start working on the final presentation and report together. I also plan to recruit some participants to participate in the usability testing of the web application and improve our website based on their feedback. If I have extra time, I will also spend some time investigating how to the web application with Canvas so instructors do not need to manually enter the student ID (which is a post-mvp goal).

Team’s Status Report for 11/11

After we received the motor on the screw rod this week, we connected it to the motor driver and managed to use codes on RPi to control its speed and direction. However, one significant risk that could jeopardize the success of the project is that with the screw rod and the NEMA 17 motor we chose, the maximum speed of the motor moving is still too slow for board erasing. After researching the alternative screws online, we have found a screw rod with 4 times wider thresh and a NEMA 23 motor that could fit in the screw rod, which is supposed to move 4 times faster than the solution we currently have. Therefore, we placed an order for the new screw and motor to address this risk. We have also come up with a backup plan that uses motor-controlled strings connected to the two sides of the linear slide to move the linear slide in case the speed of NEMA 23 is still too slow.

Besides that, there is no other major change to our system. One minor change is to add several lumber blocks at the back of the board to support the board as well as the linear slide at the top of the board. This change is necessary to address the safety concern we have discussed during the ethics assignment. Therefore, we have placed orders for that lumber together with other wood sheets and will spend next Friday together to laser cut the wood plates and assemble the attachment.

Wendy’s Status Report for 11/11

This week, our group worked together for most of the time to prepare for the interim demo, devise a detailed plan of how to connect our physical attachment to the board and place orders for the joint parts. Individually, I have also solved the problem of connecting the camera to campus WIFI, integrated the camera into our web application, and completed the OAuth login and registration functionality of the web application. Currently, I’m working on improving the user interface of the websites, which is my task for the next week. Therefore, my progress is currently on schedule. For next week, I will spend more time with my teammates on building the physical attachment and connecting the different subsystems together. I’ll also add back buttons and user log-out functionality to make the web application more user-friendly in the upcoming week and perform the latency test for the image-capturing feature.

Regarding the testing, we have planned to perform both unit tests as well as overall system test. We will test the latency of image capturing and erasing, and the usability of our web application as individual subsystems. Then, after we physically attach them to the board, we will also recruit participants to perform a usability test for the entire system. For the unit latency test, we will measure the time taken by erasing and image capturing, and compare the timing to the metrics we set to meet our user case requirement (20s for erasing the board we chose and 3s for image capturing and uploading to the web app) so it won’t impede instructors’ lecturing and students’ notetaking. For the web application usability test, we will recruit 3 users and test whether they can learn how to use the website without guidance and ask for their feedback on our websites. For the entire system usability test, we will recruit 6 users and ask questions about the cleanness of board erasing, resolution of images, latency, user experience, and accessibility of the whole system. To verify whether our project meets the use case requirements, user input would be essential. Therefore, we would analyze whether our system meets the requirement based on users’ feedback in the tests.

Wendy’s Status Report for 11/04

After finalizing our attachment design and completing the ethics assignment a week ago, our team spent the majority of time building our system in the past week. As Xiaoyu worked on the RPi code used in motor control, I and Jiayi continued working on the integration of the backend and frontend of our web application. Individually, I wrote the models.py, forms.py, and urls.py to help with the integration. In addition, I have spent a lot of time investigating the camera module, connecting it to the internet, and writing the code to control it and take a picture. Currently, I managed to complete the code that asks the camera to take a snapshot and store it in the local directory.

        

However, the current setting of the camera requires my computer to run the code to be connected to the camera’s WIFI hotspot or with a router through an ethernet port. I will still need to figure out how to connect the camera to a wireless network since this is required if we want to deploy our website and use the web application backend to communicate with RPi. Since the manual of the IP camera is a bit confusing in the wireless connection part, I have written an email to the technical support of the supplier of the camera and will continue investigating the solution to this problem.

Our original plan is to complete camera control functionality in the next week, but for the purpose of the interim demo, we have decided to complete it in advance so we can have more to demonstrate. Therefore, our progress is currently on schedule.

For next week, I hope to finish our web application, further polish its interface, and complete the usability testing of the website. Moreover, once receive the reply from the supplier, I will work on connecting the IP camera with the wireless network of CMU and finish the unit testing of the camera.

Wendy’s Status Report for 10/28

During the past week, our team has met a lot to discuss the feedback we received for the design report and redesign of our system. After realizing the risk of using a slider rail and wheels to control the movement of erasers, we decide to use a linear actuator with a screw rod so the friction won’t impede the movement of the wheels, and submitted the ordering form for the new parts. Personally, I have spent a significant amount of time researching existing stepper motor linear actuator options online and how they function in different systems, and redrawn a detailed design diagram during the past week. Moreover, I continue working on the frontend of the web application and investigating the functionalities of the camera. I have also reflected on the ethics readings to finish the ethics assignment.

Currently, my progress is on schedule. I and Jiayi are working together on integrating the front-end and back-end of the web application, and aim to demonstrate a functioning web application that can call backend functions after interacting with it on the frontend at the group meeting of the following week. However, due to the shift of the design, there is a delay in the arrival time of our parts, so the team’s progress in assembling the parts to the board is a little behind. To catch up with the project schedule, we plan to finish as much code as possible before the parts arrive, so we can quickly move to build the physical attachment and test our code once the parts have all arrived.

Wendy’s Status Report for 10/21

For the previous two weeks, I spent most of my time refining our design, researching new parts, and writing our design report with other team members. Since we have received a lot of feedback from the professors and our TA, there are a lot of changes we need to make in our design report. Individually, I have also redesigned the prototypes of the web application in response to the changes, created and adjusted the block diagram and some of the design diagrams, and investigated how to incorporate the camera module into our system. In addition, after making changes in the HTML and CSS files, I and Jiayi have discussed how to set up the Django models of our web application and started integrating the backend and frontend of the web application.

Currently, my progress is on schedule. However, since there are a lot of new tasks added to the adjusted schedule, I will make extra commitments next week to ensure that I will not be behind the schedule in the future. I will spend most of my time integrating backend functionality with my frontend interface and plan to finish integrating most of the features and polish the CSS to make the user interface easier to use. In addition, I will work with other team members to complete the ethics assignment and set up the physical attachment after our parts arrive.

To accomplish our planned tasks, I will need to learn a lot about hardware assembly and motor control. Since I have little prior experience in robotics, I didn’t realize there are so many details we need to take into consideration while designing our system. In addition, the tool I am learning right now is the IP camera we will use in our system, including how to send commands from the backend of the web application to capture an image and adjust its pan and tilt through ONVIF protocol.

Team Status Report for 10/21

In the past two weeks, our team spent most of our time adjusting our design and writing our design report. After further discussing the use case with Professor Yu, we have decided to shift our objective to build a “virtual board” that provides unlimited board space and decided to include the camera and projector in our project so students and instructors can access pictures of content after erasing it, and instructors can project the erased content back to the board.

In addition, after discussing our design with Professor Mukherjee, we realized that the hex-shaft wheels we chose would not work well with our D-shaft stepper motors, and we needed to include motor drivers and mounting hubs in our design. Moreover, we needed to reconsider the options of slider rails that will be incorporated into our design, since it might be hard to 3D print the slider rails with a length longer than 12 inches. Therefore, we spent a lot of time investigating parts with dimensions that match with each other and meet our requirements, and came up with a new list of materials. With those updated details, we have created our new design diagram and updated block diagram, placed orders for the new parts we found, and adjusted our schedule accordingly.

Since we have made a lot of changes during the past two weeks, our schedule has become slightly more packed with more additional tasks about the new features than we originally planned, which might slow down our progress in the future. The team members have decided to invest extra time during the next few weeks to set up the physical attachment and catch up with the progress to mitigate the cost.

For now, the most significant risk we identified that could jeopardize the success is we are still not sure whether our slider rail choice would fit well with the rest of the parts given that even thought the dimension matches, we need to ensure it’s strong enough to hold the other components. We planned to check out the struts at Tech Spark, but found that Tech Spark is closed during the fall break. We have also discussed the available options online but found out that the U-shaped channels that match the width of the wheels are either too high or too long for our design. We have decided to go with an aluminum U-channel that is longer than the dimension of our board and manually cut it at Tech Spark. To mitigate the risk, we have selected a few other channels that are slightly wider than we expect as backup options, and decided to place the order and pick them up as soon as possible at Home Depot if our original plan fails.